<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Empirical Regularities in Religion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2008/11/18/empirical-regularities-in-religion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2008/11/18/empirical-regularities-in-religion/</link>
	<description>The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design. - F.A. Hayek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:43:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wintercow20</title>
		<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2008/11/18/empirical-regularities-in-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>wintercow20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2008/11/18/empirical-regularities-in-religion/#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>We would need to look at the Gallup polls he is citing. I believe it is a liberal interpretation of church. While I agree that there are serious definitions of what constitutes a church that &quot;condemns sin&quot;, in terms of measuring the &quot;religiosity&quot; of Americans I am not sure a measure excluding more liberal definitions would be accurate too. The reason being that choices 100 and 200 years ago were restricted for various reasons, and societal factors played a role in what church you attended. So I am not sure that strong adherence to &quot;traditional&quot; religions back then are representative of &quot;true&quot; religiosity ... whatever that means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We would need to look at the Gallup polls he is citing. I believe it is a liberal interpretation of church. While I agree that there are serious definitions of what constitutes a church that &#8220;condemns sin&#8221;, in terms of measuring the &#8220;religiosity&#8221; of Americans I am not sure a measure excluding more liberal definitions would be accurate too. The reason being that choices 100 and 200 years ago were restricted for various reasons, and societal factors played a role in what church you attended. So I am not sure that strong adherence to &#8220;traditional&#8221; religions back then are representative of &#8220;true&#8221; religiosity &#8230; whatever that means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2008/11/18/empirical-regularities-in-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2008/11/18/empirical-regularities-in-religion/#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>I had kinda the same question about what constitutes a church.  Looking at the article (it&#039;s JSTOR, so I can access it from my school, but you need to have some sort of registration), it appears that it is survey data, so a church is defined by the surveyee instead of the surveyer.  
  Another aspect I wonder is how churches have changed over time.  It could be that most churches back in the 1700 &amp; 1800&#039;s were very &quot;fire and brimstone&quot; in the condemnation of sin.  Today there are several churches that are more of a feel-good place where sin isn&#039;t really discussed.  Naturally, more people would be willing to go to these churches.  I have had discussions with people on this, and there are many who are all to willing to sacrifice doctrine in order to get a body in the pew.  The survey does include non-Christian religions, too.  And being highly biased about this area, I believe there is a significant difference between types of churches.  None-the-less, it is an interesting article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had kinda the same question about what constitutes a church.  Looking at the article (it&#8217;s JSTOR, so I can access it from my school, but you need to have some sort of registration), it appears that it is survey data, so a church is defined by the surveyee instead of the surveyer.<br />
  Another aspect I wonder is how churches have changed over time.  It could be that most churches back in the 1700 &amp; 1800&#8242;s were very &#8220;fire and brimstone&#8221; in the condemnation of sin.  Today there are several churches that are more of a feel-good place where sin isn&#8217;t really discussed.  Naturally, more people would be willing to go to these churches.  I have had discussions with people on this, and there are many who are all to willing to sacrifice doctrine in order to get a body in the pew.  The survey does include non-Christian religions, too.  And being highly biased about this area, I believe there is a significant difference between types of churches.  None-the-less, it is an interesting article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Samples</title>
		<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2008/11/18/empirical-regularities-in-religion/comment-page-1/#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Samples</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2008/11/18/empirical-regularities-in-religion/#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>I cannot access the article, how does he define &#039;church&#039;?  Does it include only &#039;mainstream&#039; religions (I&#039;m thinking Abrahamic ones, Hinduism, Buddhism, maybe some smaller Asian ones) or does it cover paganism and the other fringe religions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot access the article, how does he define &#8216;church&#8217;?  Does it include only &#8216;mainstream&#8217; religions (I&#8217;m thinking Abrahamic ones, Hinduism, Buddhism, maybe some smaller Asian ones) or does it cover paganism and the other fringe religions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

