<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Suffering No Illusions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/01/13/suffering-no-illusions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/01/13/suffering-no-illusions/</link>
	<description>The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design. - F.A. Hayek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jb</title>
		<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/01/13/suffering-no-illusions/comment-page-1/#comment-2189</link>
		<dc:creator>jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/01/13/suffering-no-illusions/#comment-2189</guid>
		<description>It occurs to me that the spending-induced Keynesian prescription emerged during a very time. The economy has changed a great deal in 75 years.  The proportion of the workforce engaged in services is far higher. Are those of us who get laid off from our service jobs in info tech, finance and health care expected to rush out to accept work building bridges? Have the central planners even considered this as they plot our futures for us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It occurs to me that the spending-induced Keynesian prescription emerged during a very time. The economy has changed a great deal in 75 years.  The proportion of the workforce engaged in services is far higher. Are those of us who get laid off from our service jobs in info tech, finance and health care expected to rush out to accept work building bridges? Have the central planners even considered this as they plot our futures for us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/01/13/suffering-no-illusions/comment-page-1/#comment-2182</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/01/13/suffering-no-illusions/#comment-2182</guid>
		<description>Amen.  People are ready to praise the bailouts of unprofitable business structures as FDR-like, but are simultaneously eager to forget that his temporary programs, such as the CCC, also allowed for structural unemployment and industrial shifts.  With so many politicians claiming that we need to refocus our energy policies, one would think that they would at least consider aiding the production and employment of fledgling corporations and industries.  Although historical data would seem to suggest that the war was more responsible for ending crisis in FDR&#039;s time, he at least didn&#039;t have his long-term plans structured as wrongly as we evidently yearn to have ours structured now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen.  People are ready to praise the bailouts of unprofitable business structures as FDR-like, but are simultaneously eager to forget that his temporary programs, such as the CCC, also allowed for structural unemployment and industrial shifts.  With so many politicians claiming that we need to refocus our energy policies, one would think that they would at least consider aiding the production and employment of fledgling corporations and industries.  Although historical data would seem to suggest that the war was more responsible for ending crisis in FDR&#8217;s time, he at least didn&#8217;t have his long-term plans structured as wrongly as we evidently yearn to have ours structured now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

