<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Your Family Had $8,800 to Spend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/01/23/if-your-family-had-8800-to-spend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/01/23/if-your-family-had-8800-to-spend/</link>
	<description>The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design. - F.A. Hayek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: renee</title>
		<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/01/23/if-your-family-had-8800-to-spend/comment-page-1/#comment-8642</link>
		<dc:creator>renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/01/23/if-your-family-had-8800-to-spend/#comment-8642</guid>
		<description>Response to the recent comment, I would not want to at this time put any type of funds towards any type of stock nor would I really want to put towards the internet, do to lack of employment that I am seriously striving to come up from.
If it were to be me, I would rather be extremely happy to just be able to recieve a check in the amount of 2,000$$$$ monthly to just help me provide a more stable happy home for my children and family.  This would help to avoid any evictions, loss of usage of electrical and gas services, which all has just happened to me and my 2 children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Response to the recent comment, I would not want to at this time put any type of funds towards any type of stock nor would I really want to put towards the internet, do to lack of employment that I am seriously striving to come up from.<br />
If it were to be me, I would rather be extremely happy to just be able to recieve a check in the amount of 2,000$$$$ monthly to just help me provide a more stable happy home for my children and family.  This would help to avoid any evictions, loss of usage of electrical and gas services, which all has just happened to me and my 2 children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/01/23/if-your-family-had-8800-to-spend/comment-page-1/#comment-2332</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/01/23/if-your-family-had-8800-to-spend/#comment-2332</guid>
		<description>Oh, and to answer your question, I&#039;d rather have about $10 cash to buy my lunch today than a share in the stock of this &#039;company&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and to answer your question, I&#8217;d rather have about $10 cash to buy my lunch today than a share in the stock of this &#8216;company&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/01/23/if-your-family-had-8800-to-spend/comment-page-1/#comment-2331</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/01/23/if-your-family-had-8800-to-spend/#comment-2331</guid>
		<description>The numbers are just staggering. I cannot possibly imagine spending 200 billion dollars on ANYTHING, much less on &#039;Internet access for rural communities&#039;

They can keep patting themselves on the back about this and how &#039;bipartisan&#039; it is, but honestly if this is the outcome of &#039;bipartisanship,&#039; I want to go back to nasty, vicious, effective party politics. Thanks very much.

Not that it was bipartisan, the Republicans didn&#039;t really agree to any of it. Not to mention that it is growing now. Growing! Ha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers are just staggering. I cannot possibly imagine spending 200 billion dollars on ANYTHING, much less on &#8216;Internet access for rural communities&#8217;</p>
<p>They can keep patting themselves on the back about this and how &#8216;bipartisan&#8217; it is, but honestly if this is the outcome of &#8216;bipartisanship,&#8217; I want to go back to nasty, vicious, effective party politics. Thanks very much.</p>
<p>Not that it was bipartisan, the Republicans didn&#8217;t really agree to any of it. Not to mention that it is growing now. Growing! Ha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

