<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rocks Rolling Down Hills</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/07/03/rocks-rolling-down-hills/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/07/03/rocks-rolling-down-hills/</link>
	<description>The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design. - F.A. Hayek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:43:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/07/03/rocks-rolling-down-hills/comment-page-1/#comment-7149</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/07/03/rocks-rolling-down-hills/#comment-7149</guid>
		<description>You call that an old edition of the Journal? An old edition of the Journal is one that is a yellow-brown color.

I just wish the government would call a truce and say for the next month or so they would stop fiddling. OK- if they want to fiddle with making taxes lower and stop wasting money on you name it, I could tolerate that.

I have to say, however, that I don&#039;t want them to fiddle with bond indentures and the wherewithal companies have to pay back their interest and principal.  But I don&#039;t want them to kill GE. At least until 2014. 

I was talking to a retired utility executive not long ago, expressing my horror about the implications of cap-and-trade, and I got a surprisingly nonplussed reaction, like his former company would work through this, playing the game and crossing fingers. I think he hopes his defined benefit plan will survive, at least until the next few rate cases, assuming the fund did not own too many GM bonds.

Another question: what the hell is GE doing buying $1.2 billion of railcars? I know they make electric locomotive engines, but they are not in the railroad business. Could they be absorbing a committment their customers made? 

There&#039;s a novel somewhere in this story. James Patterson w/Speedmaster, co-authors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You call that an old edition of the Journal? An old edition of the Journal is one that is a yellow-brown color.</p>
<p>I just wish the government would call a truce and say for the next month or so they would stop fiddling. OK- if they want to fiddle with making taxes lower and stop wasting money on you name it, I could tolerate that.</p>
<p>I have to say, however, that I don&#8217;t want them to fiddle with bond indentures and the wherewithal companies have to pay back their interest and principal.  But I don&#8217;t want them to kill GE. At least until 2014. </p>
<p>I was talking to a retired utility executive not long ago, expressing my horror about the implications of cap-and-trade, and I got a surprisingly nonplussed reaction, like his former company would work through this, playing the game and crossing fingers. I think he hopes his defined benefit plan will survive, at least until the next few rate cases, assuming the fund did not own too many GM bonds.</p>
<p>Another question: what the hell is GE doing buying $1.2 billion of railcars? I know they make electric locomotive engines, but they are not in the railroad business. Could they be absorbing a committment their customers made? </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a novel somewhere in this story. James Patterson w/Speedmaster, co-authors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

