<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Silly Bjorn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/12/08/silly-bjorn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/12/08/silly-bjorn/</link>
	<description>The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design. - F.A. Hayek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:48:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lipstein</title>
		<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/12/08/silly-bjorn/comment-page-1/#comment-11127</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lipstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 02:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunbrokenwindow.com/?p=1939#comment-11127</guid>
		<description>It was never an issue of actually stopping warming, it will always be about seizing power</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was never an issue of actually stopping warming, it will always be about seizing power</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/12/08/silly-bjorn/comment-page-1/#comment-11118</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunbrokenwindow.com/?p=1939#comment-11118</guid>
		<description>It always amazed me how much &quot;environmental economists&quot; can totally ignore basic economics.  In most of my classes, the story goes: Global warming is manmade and a problem, and here are some ways to solve it.  But the answer misses the most interesting questions; for the sake of argument assume global warming is manmade and represents a cost in the future.  Should we do anything about it?  What are the opportunity costs; how are the costs discounted for time?  Not to mention anything about the variability in future damage cost estimates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always amazed me how much &#8220;environmental economists&#8221; can totally ignore basic economics.  In most of my classes, the story goes: Global warming is manmade and a problem, and here are some ways to solve it.  But the answer misses the most interesting questions; for the sake of argument assume global warming is manmade and represents a cost in the future.  Should we do anything about it?  What are the opportunity costs; how are the costs discounted for time?  Not to mention anything about the variability in future damage cost estimates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedmaster</title>
		<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2009/12/08/silly-bjorn/comment-page-1/#comment-11116</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunbrokenwindow.com/?p=1939#comment-11116</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; &quot;I used to think Global Warming policy was about people. Now I know better – it is simply the latest religious fad to eliminate private property and free enterprise.&quot;

Bingo!  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; &#8220;I used to think Global Warming policy was about people. Now I know better – it is simply the latest religious fad to eliminate private property and free enterprise.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bingo!  <img src='http://theunbrokenwindow.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

