<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Which I Would Sign Up to Be a Keynesian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2010/02/08/in-which-i-would-sign-up-to-be-a-keynesian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2010/02/08/in-which-i-would-sign-up-to-be-a-keynesian/</link>
	<description>The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design. - F.A. Hayek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:45:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2010/02/08/in-which-i-would-sign-up-to-be-a-keynesian/comment-page-1/#comment-12692</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunbrokenwindow.com/?p=2304#comment-12692</guid>
		<description>I defer to your understanding of Keynes, Perfesser.  I&#039;ve read segments of the original, but enough analysis of his work to think your critique of so-called Keynseans makes complete sense, and you make a great point. Folks such as Paul Krugman and Laura Tyson appeal to the authority of Keynes whenever it suits their purpose of taking property from some people and distributing it to other people according to their ideas about justice. 

In many respects, these days remind me of 1979, and I would argue that we don&#039;t have the worst recession since the days of the Great Depression, but rather since the days of Jimmy Carter. I know the parallels are not exactly the same: for example, bond yields do not yet reflect the inflation we have experienced, and will experience. 

I do remember taxes being cut (in three phases according to the wisdom of Dave Stockman), the price of oil falling, and, in 1982, perhaps the brightest investment outlook I can remember in my life.

I remember federal revenues rising, Congress consuming the taxes and then some. I remember Anne Gorsuch, Reagan&#039;s EPA administrator being eviscerated for her attempts to diminish the powers of her domain. But in those days Robert Bartley was on the top of his game: he was proved right, and ever since folks like Paul Krugman and Laura Tyson have been sore. The first thing out of Ms Tyson&#039;s mouth (as Clinton&#039;s CEA chief) was &quot;stimulus&quot; and the first thing out of her mouth after Obama was elected was &quot;stimulus,&quot;
meaning just like Jimmy Carter, we should drop hundred-dollar bills out of airplanes, only this time there should be more tons, this time dropped correctly, using GPS, over defaulting mortgagees who live in favored precincts. Paul Krugman says the last $800 billion airlift was not enough.

Your real question is whether all this is just two steps forward, one step back. I don&#039;t think &quot;the Keynseans&quot; will change their minds this late in their careers, but I smell rebellion out there, especially since many have figured out what these grand plans will cost them. Remember, Bastiat didn&#039;t have a blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I defer to your understanding of Keynes, Perfesser.  I&#8217;ve read segments of the original, but enough analysis of his work to think your critique of so-called Keynseans makes complete sense, and you make a great point. Folks such as Paul Krugman and Laura Tyson appeal to the authority of Keynes whenever it suits their purpose of taking property from some people and distributing it to other people according to their ideas about justice. </p>
<p>In many respects, these days remind me of 1979, and I would argue that we don&#8217;t have the worst recession since the days of the Great Depression, but rather since the days of Jimmy Carter. I know the parallels are not exactly the same: for example, bond yields do not yet reflect the inflation we have experienced, and will experience. </p>
<p>I do remember taxes being cut (in three phases according to the wisdom of Dave Stockman), the price of oil falling, and, in 1982, perhaps the brightest investment outlook I can remember in my life.</p>
<p>I remember federal revenues rising, Congress consuming the taxes and then some. I remember Anne Gorsuch, Reagan&#8217;s EPA administrator being eviscerated for her attempts to diminish the powers of her domain. But in those days Robert Bartley was on the top of his game: he was proved right, and ever since folks like Paul Krugman and Laura Tyson have been sore. The first thing out of Ms Tyson&#8217;s mouth (as Clinton&#8217;s CEA chief) was &#8220;stimulus&#8221; and the first thing out of her mouth after Obama was elected was &#8220;stimulus,&#8221;<br />
meaning just like Jimmy Carter, we should drop hundred-dollar bills out of airplanes, only this time there should be more tons, this time dropped correctly, using GPS, over defaulting mortgagees who live in favored precincts. Paul Krugman says the last $800 billion airlift was not enough.</p>
<p>Your real question is whether all this is just two steps forward, one step back. I don&#8217;t think &#8220;the Keynseans&#8221; will change their minds this late in their careers, but I smell rebellion out there, especially since many have figured out what these grand plans will cost them. Remember, Bastiat didn&#8217;t have a blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

