<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Compulsory&#8221; as an Economic Concept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2010/02/19/compulsory-as-an-economic-concept/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2010/02/19/compulsory-as-an-economic-concept/</link>
	<description>The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design. - F.A. Hayek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:43:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://theunbrokenwindow.com/2010/02/19/compulsory-as-an-economic-concept/comment-page-1/#comment-12880</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 05:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunbrokenwindow.com/?p=2398#comment-12880</guid>
		<description>I had to read your piece four times before I understood; had to refer back to the first and second scenarios. 

You make a great case for a free market.

Regarding a &quot;true definition&quot;, doesn&#039;t that presume what follows, whoever answers, is true? Philosophical arguments aside, how can one avoid Aristotle? 

Your brilliant student was brave to ask such a question, especially after three decades of political correctness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to read your piece four times before I understood; had to refer back to the first and second scenarios. </p>
<p>You make a great case for a free market.</p>
<p>Regarding a &#8220;true definition&#8221;, doesn&#8217;t that presume what follows, whoever answers, is true? Philosophical arguments aside, how can one avoid Aristotle? </p>
<p>Your brilliant student was brave to ask such a question, especially after three decades of political correctness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

