Feed on
Posts
Comments

If we paid more attention to the nuances of our everyday lives, we would all be going crazier than we already are. Did you ever go to a restaurant that serves lobster and think carefuly about what the menu is saying? I was at a wonderful Italian place in Newport a few weeks ago when I finally did so myself. As I considered the items on the menu, I was deciding among the $12.95 gnocchi, the $24.95 filet or the lobster, which was listed at “market price.” Why the heck does lobster not have a static price listed? Now, this would not that interesting a question to many of you, particularly if you understand why it’s bad that the government is allowed to print money, in that the price of lobster changes rapidly – as costs and demand change rapidly for that particular foodstuff. However, if we accept this and are wiling to pay the “market price” for a lobster,then what kind of prices are the gnocchi and filet selling for? “Non-market” prices? You Keynesians out there will just say that this is evidence that transactions costs give rise to sticky prices and that there are no such things as market prices- but I am not buying it. Do gnocchi costs and demand not change rapidly – perhaps, but I don’t believe that is also true for filet? Why aren’t filet’s listed at “market prices”? They are, after all, “luxury” foodstuffs, just like lobster – so why are they treated differently? I welcome your ideas on this one …

Leave a Reply

books on zlibrary official