This abstract says it all:
Why are the 2000s so different from the 1970s? A structural interpretation of changes in the macroeconomic effects of oil prices …
In the 1970s, large increases in the price of oil were associated with sharp decreases in output and large increases in inflation. In the 2000s, and at least until the end of 2007, even larger increases in the price of oil were associated with much milder movements in output and inflation. Using a structural VAR approach Blanchard and Gali (2007a) argued that this has reflected in large part a change in the causal relation from the price of oil to output and inflation. In order to shed light on the possible factors behind the decrease in the macroeconomic effects of oil price shocks, we develop a new-Keynesian model, with imported oil used both in production and consumption, and we use a minimum distance estimator that minimizes, over the set of structural parameters and for each of the two samples (pre and post 1984), the distance between the empirical SVAR-based impulse response functions and those implied by the model. Our results point to two relevant changes in the structure of the economy, which have modified the transmission mechanism of the oil shock: vanishing wage indexation and an improvement in the
credibility of monetary policy. The relative importance of these two structural changes depends however on how we formalize the process of expectations formation by economic agents.
So, why was the oil price shock in the 1970s different than that in the 2000s? Can you get it from reading a summary of a technical paper like this? Nope. I’m not sure I can tell you – but do you really think it had something to do with vanishing wage indexation and credibility of monetary policy? Maybe. But how about this:
The oil price “shock” in the 1970s was a result of a decrease in world oil supply. There was less stuff to go around. The oil price “shock” in the 2000s was largely a result on an increase in demand. There was more stuff to go around. So while in the 1970s, when we paid a lot more for oil and the things oil was used to produce, we had far less “stuff” to trade for the newly scarce oil. In the 2000s when we pay more for oil, we are richer, we have a lot more “stuff” to trade for oil. Or to put it another way, when oil prices rise due to a limited supply of it, we have to do more with less. When oil prices rise because more people wish to use oil relative to the past, we get to do more with more. Chinese and Indian demanders do not wake up one day and demand oil. They must first produce something of value in order to get that oil. If they increase their demand for oil by first producing goods and services others value, then the world is undeniably richer. If oil prices had risen because we blew up some wells in the Middle East, we still must make high tradeoffs at the margin to secure oil, but we don’t have all of that other good stuff produced by those would-be demanders.
Even simpler: expensive oil with less stuff < expensive oil with lots of stuff. What is so difficult to understand?
Hahahah.
My macroeconomics textbook tells me the reason why oil prices were so high in the 70s is because of a coordinated price increase by OPEC.
And in a world of properly functioning property rights, shouldn’t cartels be banned because they raise or stabilize prices against market forces, therefore mis-allocating goods from those who value it the most to those who might not value it as much?
“People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.” – Adam Smith
Sanket: Cartels do reduce output. However, the only way to make an action by another sovereign state illegal is to invade. Cartels are difficult to maintain and frequently fall apart on their own. As long as there is free entry into the market, entrepreneurs will be tempted to enter and compete away the excess profit. When you see long term cartel-like profit, ask yourself – “Why isn’t there entry?” Adam Smith was right to point out that businesses can be self interested and greedy, but he also demonstrated the power of competition to constrain them.
Wintercow20: Great post. Basic supply and demand analysis is very powerful, and it is a pity that economists aren’t more fluent in it. Confusing supply and demand shocks is tragically common.
Muchas gracias. ?Como puedo iniciar sesion?
666473 516711This really is a exceptional blog, would you be involved in doing an interview about just how you developed it? If so e-mail me! 852231
318730 972288I truly like your writing style, fantastic data, thankyou for posting : D. 93789
cinemakick
861523 532269It shows how you comprehend this topic. Added this page, is for far more. 139534
152181 663559Sweet internet internet site , super design , really clean and utilize genial . 455126
provigil dosage – provigil for adhd modafinil dosage
Hi friends, how is everything, and what you wish for to say regardingthis paragraph, in my view its in fact awesome for me.
Hello. This article was extremely interesting, especially since I was searching for thoughts on this matter last Sunday. Julienne Reece Madeleine
Good post. I’m dealing with a few of these issues as well..
Thanks for the post.Much thanks again. Fantastic.
I value the article post.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.
Really enjoyed this article post.Much thanks again. Want more.
340510 225236Immigration […]the time to read or pay a visit to the content or sites we have linked to below the[…] 732914
Major thankies for the post.Really thank you! Great.
Fantastic blog. Fantastic.
Great blog article.Much thanks again. Much obliged.
Womens Ray Ban Sunglasses Womens Ray Ban Sunglasses
There is obviously a lot to know about this. I assume you made certain good points in features also.
But wanna say that this is invaluable , Thanks for taking your time to write this.
cvs pharmacy online – canadian pharmacy victoza cvs pharmacy
cefdinir and generation cephalosporin what is cefdinir medication omnicef for sinusitis
Good day! This post could not be written any better!Reading this post reminds me of my old room mate!He always kept chatting about this. I will forward this write-upto him. Fairly certain he will have a good read. Thank you for sharing!
I couldn?t resist commenting. Very well written!Take a look at my blog post – gas patio heater
Thank you, I’ve just been searching for info about this subject for a while and yours is the greatest I’ve found out so far. However, what about the conclusion? Are you positive about the supply?
I am now not sure the place you’re getting your info, however great topic.I must spend some time learning much more or understanding more.Thank you for wonderful information I used to be on the lookout for this info for mymission.
My own P. “Oh yes, auntie to forget. I’m sorry.” Auntie realized that Mr. My P is still standing straight and not satisfied.
Looking forward to reading more. Great blog article.Really thank you! Great.
Theses and dissertations help with writing a dissertationphd dissertation database
best otc ed pills 2015 – best over the counter ed pills at mothers otc ed pills 2018
I take pleasure in, lead to I discovered just what I was taking a look for. You’ve ended my four day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a nice day. Bye
Change the number of reps, weight you lift and exercises you choose.
I relish, lead to I found exactly what I used to be looking for. You have ended my four day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a nice day. Bye
hidroxicloroquina hydroxychloroquine online