Yesterday we discussed the idea of how bundling choices together may lead choosers to select vastly different things than if they voted for items a la carte. How does this idea translate into the political realm? There are two applications. First, how would the policies we get enacted from Congress change if rather than voting for them a la carte, we voted for them in bundles? Second, how would the outcomes of elections change if we voted or parties or candidates or ideas in bundles rather than on a case by case basis?
In regard to the first, I believe we already have the answer. The way the budget process works in Congress and the way various bills are formulated is that they rarely are ever well defined, narrowly targeted bills. In order for Congress to build consensus on anything, riders and provisions are added to laws in order to turn some former majority opposition votes into new minority favorite votes. So, you and a majority of Congressmen might actually think that expanding the welfare state via a new health reform is fiscally troublesome particularly in light of the already precarious financial position of the government. And you would have no difficulty voting against ObamaCare when you stand with the majority. However, when inserted into that bill are other provisions that have nothing to do with health care, but which you, in the minority, would stand to lose out if you vote against the bill, well, it is not hard to see how you would change your vote.
At first glance it would appear that bundling allows for the government to do a great many more things than it would do if all policies were voted for with no riders whatsoever. However, I am not so sure that a simple procedural change would mean that government would do less, that spending would fall or that tax increases would slow down. Why? Because I think we are likely to see de facto bundling in the form of increased logrolling and other nefarious arrangements if the formal method of bundling were undone. So I look with suspicion upon folks who think it is a simple matter to clean up what is going on in DC (more on that later).
In regard to the second, the likely outcome would depend on exactly what one proposes to bundle. Should we bundle by party? I’d argue that we already do that with the gerrymandering of Congressional district and the ability to vote an entire ticket already – so I do not think we’d get an outcome much different than we see today. However, if candidates were listed according to the ideas they espouse and promise to enact, how would the outcome change? Again I do not think very much.
As much press as the partisans on each side of the aisle get, I suspect that a wide chunk of America does not feel too strongly about either party, and that there are a few ideas that are important to them – and they end up voting for the candidates who espouse those ideas. Think of single issue voters. If this is the case, the informational costs of finding out who supports a single position are far lower than understanding the entire locus of candidates’ positions – and thus it is plausible for voters to at least be moderately educated about their policy of choice. My sense (I am sure someone has run regressions on this somewhere) is that people then are already bundling when they make their political choices. So, just as in the first case above, I think the interesting question would be, what would our political world look like if we, in fact, managed to unbundle the decisions we are making in that sector?
I am not optimistic the outcomes would be any better.
UPDATE: Here is the head of the AFL-CIO after recognizing that the union dream of “card-check” legislation is not likely to pass on its own (i.e. without being bundled)
Coming after the automobile bailout, the stimulus and the mother of all entitlements in ObamaCare, Big Labor has had plenty to celebrate. Rich Trumka, the AFL-CIO boss, wants more. His latest idea is to sneak card check into some other legislation.
“Anything we can get it attached to,” he said the other day. “There are multitudes of things we can get it attached to, and we will. We will get it done and it will be a good thing for the country.” Or at least for the unions.
I would guess that an unbundled political system would essential have to be where everyone votes on everything. I don’t think it would be possible to find a representative who thinks like I do on every issue, or at least the cost of finding one is probably higher than me representing myself, so I agree that we already bundle when we choose a candidate (which is a selection between different shoddy goods).
It might be possible to have a system where everyone votes if all issues were kept between a small group of people. Ideally, I think that I should be able to completely ignore the political world because by-and-large they should be sticking their nose into my business.
641025 100235There is numerous separate years Los angeles Weight reduction eating strategy with each a person is actually a necessity. The pioneer part can be your original acquiring rid of belonging to the extra pounds. la weight loss 399009
576479 560681Thank you for your great post! It has long been very insightful. I hope that you will continue sharing your wisdom with us. 947084
574435 725726[…]the time to read or go to the content or web sites we have linked to below the[…] 346532
198946 687061Hey, you used to write wonderful, but the last couple of posts have been kinda boringK I miss your super writings. Past several posts are just slightly bit out of track! come on! 807488
891274 590184Oh my goodness! a fantastic post dude. Thanks a whole lot Nevertheless I is going to be experiencing trouble with ur rss . Dont know why Not able to sign up for it. Is there everyone acquiring identical rss concern? Anybody who knows kindly respond. Thnkx 713062
268579 434593Hello there, just became alert to your weblog by means of Google, and located that its truly informative. Im going to watch out for brussels. I will appreciate if you continue this in future. Many people is going to be benefited from your writing. Cheers! 403002
990032 36104The very good intreguing articles keep me coming back here time and time again. thank you so considerably. 763734
116191 738634There is noticeably a bundle comprehend this. I suppose you produced specific nice points in functions also. 458632
173814 441378I enjoy your composing style, do carry on creating! I will probably be back! 123433
748466 917524I like the valuable information you supply inside your articles. Ill bookmark your blog and check once again here regularly. Im quite certain Ill learn numerous new stuff correct here! Excellent luck for the next! 477140
139943 924610Couldn?t be developed any greater. Reading this post reminds me of my old room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this report to him. Pretty certain he will possess a good read. Thanks for sharing! 404933
608556 110400Id require to consult you here. Which isnt some thing Which i do! I enjoy reading a post that can make men and women feel. Also, appreciate your permitting me to comment! 824497
958130 980978 An interesting discussion is worth comment. I believe that you ought to write far more on this topic, it might not be a taboo topic but normally men and women are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers 569798
916935 494670Thank her so considerably! This line is move before dovetail crazy, altarpiece rather act like habitual the economizing – what entrepreneur groovy night until deal with starting a trade. 603163
663672 406791Official NFL jerseys, NHL jerseys, Pro and replica jerseys customized with Any Name / Number in Pro-Stitched Tackle Twill. All NHL teams, full range of styles and apparel. Signed NFL NHL player jerseys and custom team hockey and football uniforms 958336