After reading this, I just saw this in the news. I’m sure it is all just made up, falsification by the oil companies.
Actually, now that I think about it, would that be comforting to find out?
Here are some treats:
the important thing is to make sure they’re loosing the PR battle. That’s what Real Climate is about
Try this one on:
I agree with Nick that climate change might be a better labelling than global warming
Or this one:
Cook:
A growing body of evidence clearly shows [2008] that hydroclimatic variability
during the putative MWP (more appropriately and inclusively called the
“Medieval Climate Anomaly” or MCA period) was more regionally extreme (mainly
in terms of the frequency and duration of megadroughts) than anything we have
seen in the 20th century, except perhaps for the Sahel. So in certain ways the
MCA period may have been more climatically extreme than in modern times.
And one more:
<4693> Crowley:
I am not convinced that the “truth” is always worth reaching if it is at the
cost of damaged personal relationships
There’s too many to excerpt. How depressing.
I guess other readers are busy.
I would suggest that readers go to the public library and ask for the book Wintercow linked, forcing them to buy it, just as they did for Earth in the Balance, which the librarians did on their own without prompting.
While you are at it, ask them for Economic Sophisms, especially if you donate money to the local branch of the government-run library.
The book is The Hockey Stick Illusion.
It’s not a hockey stick. It’s a six iron.