Feed on
Posts
Comments

This week we are treated to this:

Eric Bettleheim, environmental and financial markets expert, and distinguished Rochester alum, gave a guest lecture in one of my classes. His topic, which I found particularly stimulating, was the reality of corporate social responsibility, or CSR. CSR is defined as “the duty a corporation has to create wealth by using means that avoid harm to, protect, or enhance societal assets” and has three components: market forces, mandated social programs, and voluntary social programs.

These kinds of experiences provided significant support for his point that CSR and environmental governance sometimes just utilize words to avoid instead of absorb externalities.
His key point seemed to be that ultimately, the threat of climate change and resource depletion needs a large-scale movement similar to the one that formed in opposition to the Vietnam War. Global cooperation is necessary to enact meaningful change. He stressed that the typical time scale may be too long. The fossil fuel industry is huge, and will fight off any significant change for years and years.

Same tired canard. It’s nauseating to watch the green movement use language like this wholly ignorant of the fact, yes fact, that it does the same exact thing. This little nifty post being a perfect example. We need Vietnam War era opposition to prevent resource depletion? I have a solution – it’s called property and prices. No riots or Kent State’s required. And as for the climate change thingy, well, let’s just say that our esteemed Mr. Bettleheim is surely above board on all of this, right? After all, this is what his website tells us:

He is a Founder and was Executive Chairman of Sustainable Forestry Management (SFM) Ltd, from 1999 to 2009.  He established SFM as a private group of companies dedicated to realising value from the ethical and sustainable use of tropical and sub-tropical forests including the environmental services which they provide. Eric is widely regarded as a leading pioneer in the development of forest and land-use carbon market policy and investment. He has worked extensively with private, public and non-governmental institutions to promote investment throughout the developing world to provide sustainable livelihoods in restored and preserved forest ecosystems.

Right, and surely there is no profit to be had from the development of carbon regulations that promote offsets as a mitigation strategy. It would be nice in a short blurb on social responsibility and ethics for someone to recognize this potential conflict of interest. Or is it the case that only BP speaks and does different things?

7 Responses to “Corporate Social Responsibility, for Some Corporations Only”

  1. poker says:

    698195 202061learning toys can enable your kids to develop their motor skills quite easily;; 951535

  2. altogel says:

    715976 409044hey there i stumbled upon your website searching around the internet. I wanted to tell you I enjoy the appear of points about here. Keep it up will bookmark for confident. 47091

  3. 71985 24689They call it the self-censor, basically because youre too self-conscious of your writing, too judgmental. 446235

  4. Plinko says:

    795952 640822hi great page i will definaely come back and see once more. 776007

  5. 469873 228739Thankyou for all your efforts that you have put in this. very fascinating information . 623559

  6. Jonathan says:

    879303 401307Hello! I simply would wish to offer a huge thumbs up for that great info youve here during this post. I is going to be returning to your site to get much more soon. 254456

  7. 520662 69856Having read this I thought it was extremely informative. I appreciate you taking the time and effort to put this write-up together. I once again locate myself spending strategy to significantly time both reading and commenting. But so what, it was still worth it! 878267

Leave a Reply