If ever there was a myth to be shattered it would be that your “government” is out there “for the people.” Here’s the latest via Coyote:
National Park Officials closed down the educational Claude Moore Colonial Farm near the CIA in McLean, Va., even though the federal government doesn’t fund or staff the park popular with children and schools. Just because the privately-operated park is on Park Service land, making the federal government simply its landlord, the agency decided to close it.
A Claude Moore Colonial Farm official said that the privately-funded staff is on the job Wednesday, but barred from letting anybody visit the historically accurate buildings or animals. Anna Eberly, the managing director, sent out an email decrying the decision and rude National Park Service staff handling the closure.
Pointing to Park Service claims that parks have to be closed because the agency can’t afford staff during the government closure, Eberly wrote: “What utter crap. We have operated the Farm successfully for 32 years after the NPS cut the Farm from its budget in 1980 and are fully staffed and prepared to open today. But there are barricades at the Pavilions and entrance to the Farm. And if you were to park on the grass and visit on your own, you run the risk of being arrested. Of course, that will cost the NPS staff salaries to police the Farm against intruders while leaving it open will cost them nothing.”
She added: “In all the years I have worked with the National Park Service, first as a volunteer for six years in Richmond where I grew up, then as an NPS employee at the for eight very long years and now enjoyably as managing director for the last 32 years — I have never worked with a more arrogant, arbitrary and vindictive group representing the NPS. I deeply apologize that we have to disappoint you today by being closed but know that we are working while the National Park Service is not — as usual.”
By the way I’d be willing to pay higher taxes if the EPA and Department of Education were shut down as well. Would the progressives take that tradeoff? I’d even ask rich people to pay higher taxes. Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?
Maybe we should close Interior too?
UPDATE: And Coyote hears back from one of his customers:
I got this email a few minutes ago.
Mr. Meyer: I just wanted to thank you for the letter you wrote to our senators and congressmen.
My fiance and I are scheduled to be married this Saturday at Red Rock Crossing. On Tuesday, I called and was told that the park would be open and unaffected by shutdown.
As you can imagine, the news today has me very worried. We have spent literally thousands of dollars to have a special couple of hours in the park with our families who are flying in from all over the United States and the thought of not being able to have our wedding in our dream location is upsetting to say the least.
I hope and pray that your parks and campgrounds continue to stay open.
Red Rock Crossing is a privately-operated campground that the USFS has slated for closure Friday not because it uses too much Federal money (it in fact uses none and pays rent to the Treasury) but because the White House apparently wants to artificially increase the cost of the shutdown. Well, you got your wish Mr. President.
PS- for those who are concerned, we are going to find a way to help this guy get married, even if I have to sneak them into the facility myself.
I’m surprised that some in the news media don’t roll out a guy like this for every guy they roll out who is suffering due to a lost government paycheck.
UPDATE: Here is the deal on the forest service again:
Its Official: US Forest Service Closing over 1000 Privately-Funded Parks
October 2, 2013, 5:36 pmThe US Forest Service, under pressure apparently from the White House, has reversed both its historical precedent as well as its position yesterday and will close over 1000 public parks and campgrounds that are operated by private companies without using one dime of public money. Why does the fact that our landlord the US Forest Service is going on an unpaid vacation mean that tenants of theirs have to close up shop too? We have no idea.
This is how I explained it in my letter to my senators:
My company, based in North Phoenix, operates over 100 US Forest Service campgrounds and day use areas under concession contract. Yesterday, as in all past government shutdowns, the Department of Agriculture and US Forest Service confirmed we would stay open during the government shutdown. This makes total sense, since our operations are self-sufficient (we are fully funded by user fees at the gate), we get no federal funds, we employ no government workers on these sites, and we actually pay rent into the Treasury.
However, today, we have been told by senior member of the US Forest Service and Department of Agriculture that people “above the department”, which I presume means the White House, plan to order the Forest Service to needlessly and illegally close all private operations. I can only assume their intention is to artificially increase the cost of the shutdown as some sort of political ploy.
The point of the shutdown is to close non-essential operations that require Federal money and manpower to stay open. So why is the White House closing private operations that require no government money to keep open and actually pay a percentage of their gate revenues back to the Treasury? We are a tenant of the US Forest Service, and a tenant does not have to close his business just because his landlord goes on a vacation.
You’re supposed to be writing your 108 exam questions now, aren’t you, Professor? At least that’s what you told us 35 minutes ago…
ZT, you are a brave smartass. You must have read the required reading, and are familiar with what professor Wintercow has taught, and showed up for class, and did not make cricket squeaks.
Don’t forget the Departments of Labor and Agriculture. Give the food stamps and unemployment benefits to Kathleen Sibelius, the Mother Cow.
Then there’s the story about getting Scrod in Boston….