Do you know of a study that has examined both (the difference) between the market value of the global assets at risk over the next 100 years from rising sea levels and increasing storm intensity versus the replacement value of the global assets at risk over the next 100 years from rising sea levels and increasing storm intensity? Do we believe these numbers are close? Are they farther apart in wealthier countries or poorer countries? How are coastal insurance policies written? Have real estate insurance premiums in “at risk” locations changed over the last 30 years? Should we use the VSL to evaluate the potential health and mortality risks to people around the world, why not also think about a colder utilitarian calculation?
Leave a Reply
Posterity
Health Care as a Right - Universal Health Care
That's Just a Silly Model, What About the REAL World?
Do You Hope that "Your Guy" Wins?
Economics Doesn't Apply to That
Clunk - The New Year's Ball Has Dropped
Raise Your Hand if You Are Morally Corrupt
Unscrupulous Middlemen and Feckless Citizens
Violence, Penury and Modern Society
Oranges are Not Oranges, They are Ideas
What Does Your Bumper Sticker Say?
The Right to Escape Oppression
Eat Your Heart Out Andrew Carnegie
Latest Tweets
Categories
-
Recent Posts
Archives