Feed on
Posts
Comments

From my friend Chris M:

I wonder how many people share both of these sentiments concurrently?

  1. The last U.S. election was invalid because the electoral college usurped the popular vote.
  2. The brexit results were wrong and we should have a revote.

Indeed. When I hear the words “more Democracy” uttered, I simply hear, “I want to impose my will on you.”

25 Responses to “Choice > Voice, All Day Long”

  1. Andrew says:

    I feel like you’re oversimplifying this quite a bit. I’m not one of these people who says that we should let majorities do whatever they want, since our government correctly has many anti-majoritarian features meant to protect the rights of the minority (i.e. the Supreme Court, the high bar you have to climb to amend the constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Equal Protection Clause). But even though we put things in place to prevent the people who get more votes from oppressing the people who get less votes, usually in a democratic system what we don’t do is allow the people who get less votes to actually govern.

    So that is the issue with the electoral college, since it doesn’t really operate as originally intended and just produces a mathematical oddity every once in a while where the candidate with less votes wins. The electoral college was intended to be a deliberative body rather than just adopting wholesale the vote tallies of a state. Take Federalist 68: “It was equally desirable, that the immediate election should be made by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice. A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations.” You can argue about whether this would have been a good idea, but I feel like it makes more sense to either be serious about what the electoral college was originally supposed to be (which I doubt many people would want today), or just to scrap it and go with full-on democracy, since otherwise you just get a situation where voters in certain states are more important than others for no really good reason. I’m not going to pretend direct democracy is necessarily what the framers really wanted, since I don’t doubt that some folks like Jefferson would have wanted to have a system where rural states get an advantage in selecting the president. But your post seems to dismiss very good arguments against the electoral college without really engaging the issue or offering anything more fair.

    As for Brexit, it’s harder for me to say because if it were the U.S., the U.S. constitution doesn’t allow for nationwide ballot measures like that, so one could make the argument that a complicated decision like Brexit should not have been put up to a national vote. But assuming that a nationwide vote was the correct thing to do there, I think a revote would function less to show that the initial results were wrong at the time, but rather to allow the people to change their minds when seeing the practical difficulties of accomplishing Brexit and other issues. After all, U.S. House elections happen every two years precisely so it can respond to the changing passions of the people.

    • wintercow20 says:

      But the post has little to do with the merits, or lack thereof, of the electoral college. It is simply asking about the consistency of accepting one set of democratic rules because it leads to results one likes versus another set which in an instance may not.
      As far as the usefulness of the electoral college – we are long since past having a discussion of democratic reforms – if only the issue were the electoral college. How about the way we do nominating conventions? How about the way we popularly elect senators? How about the number of representatives? And so on.

  2. jb says:

    On a related note, I came across this nonsense (below) incredibly enough published in the Wall Street Journal. The author is unhappy with the fact that the Senate is “undemocratic” because every state gets 2 senators regardless of population (he simply asserts that this is a bad thing). Then he goes on to describe his Rube Goldberg redesign of the constitution in order to make it right.

    It seems to NEVER OCCUR to this guy, a law professor, that if he (or anyone else) feels underrepresented in the senate he can simply move to a less populated state.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/divide-states-to-democratize-the-senate-1542672828?commentId=24fb8b49-1c66-4930-9130-ecd95a714f8b#comments_sector

  3. At this time it appears like Movable Type is the best
    blogging platform out there right now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what you are using on your blog?!

  4. Hi! Do you know if they make any plugins to help with Search Engine Optimization? I’m
    trying to get my website to rank for some targeted keywords but
    I’m not seeing very good success. If you know of any please share.
    Cheers! I saw similar blog here: Wool product

  5. Cara says:

    Hey there! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with SEO?
    I’m trying to get my website to rank for some targeted keywords but
    I’m not seeing very good gains. If you know of any please share.

    Cheers! I saw similar art here: Wool product

  6. online chat says:

    982803 388919Fascinating web site, i read it but i still have several questions. shoot me an email and we will talk a lot more becasue i may possibly have an fascinating notion for you. 132813

  7. ghoster13 says:

    537278 455562So, is this just for men, just for females, or is it for both sexes If it s not, then do girls want to do anything different to put on muscle 338639

  8. 25466 216897Hello super schner Webblog den ihr da habt. Bin gerade ber die Google Suche darber gestolpert. Gefllt mir echt super gut. macht weiter so. MFG Martina 509053

  9. 197117 318722I cant say that I completely agree, but then once again Ive never genuinely thought of it quite like that before. Thanks for giving me something to think about when Im supposed to have an empty mind while trying to fall asleep tonight lol.. 420582

  10. 208769 166985Some genuinely nice and utilitarian information on this internet website , likewise I believe the style and style contains superb functions. 893466

  11. free show says:

    23189 610983Thanks for the info provided! I was researching for this write-up for a long time, but I was not able to see a dependable source. 954815

  12. 63141 703408Wow ~ Good stuff ~ Come and look at MY ?? 760389

  13. Thanks to knowledgeable and dedicated people like you, the internet becomes a more useful place for travelers. I loved your article and have already started applying what I learned from it to my upcoming trip. We also discussed a similar topic about budget travel on TravelForums. Thank you so much!

  14. Lamentos says:

    Dinle: Oblomov Sessizliği Türkçe Rap Beat

  15. This article was truly eye-opening; I learned so much! Your insights on travel-related topics have expanded my perspective greatly. Thank you for taking the time to share this with us. We had discussed a similar topic about travel tips on TravelForums. I look forward to seeing more of your work in the future! Amazing content, I both learned and enjoyed reading it.

  16. medartix.com says:

    Thanks again for the article post. Want more.

  17. I value the post.Thanks Again. Cool.

  18. biyapay says:

    Wow, great article post. Cool.

  19. Thank you ever so for you blog article.Really thank you! Want more.

  20. A big thank you for your blog article.Really thank you! Want more.

  21. water bong says:

    Thank you ever so for you blog.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.

  22. I really enjoy the blog article.Really thank you! Fantastic.

  23. I am so grateful for your article.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

Leave a Reply