Feed on
Posts
Comments

A popular argument in the “environmentalist” community is that pollution is a moral wrong. By extension this belief holds that using market instruments such as taxes and tradable permits to control pollution are no different than allowing burglars to pay for the privilege of burgling houses. What is wrong with this analogy?

Pollution is a COST, not a moral wrong. What does it mean to be a cost? It means that pollution is a by-product of a socially beneficial activity. And to reduce pollution therefore requires that we get less of the things that we like (remember intro econ: there is no such thing as a free lunch). A tax or a marketable permit is simply an instrument that induces “polluters” to internalize the full costs of their actions, rather than have those costs borne by unwilling participants. A “fee” paid by a burglar is not simply a cost of doing something we want – that is because burgling a house is an economically harmful activity. Ignoring the moral aspect for a moment, even if you view the burgling as a pure transfer from homeowner to burglar, the burglar expends valuable resources on these actions when they could have devoted their time to actions that were socially beneficial.

It might seem odd that environmentalists do not also criticize the direct regulation of the environment, since efficient regulation (in theory) should get us the same amount of pollution reduction, clean air, clean water, etc. as a well designed tax or permit system. In other words, efficient regulation does not bring us down to a zero pollution level as well. For example, regulating an industry so that it must reduce emissions by 80% is the SAME THING as arguing that it is “allowed” to continue polluting with the other 20%. It seems odd to criticize some methods for doing this and not others. Perhaps much of environmentalism is actually not about the environment.

11 Responses to “Costs and Moral Wrongs”

  1. Speedmaster says:

    Bravo! I’m reminded of what T. Sowell said: there are no solutions, only trade-offs.

  2. dark168 says:

    258518 703674Following study some of the websites together with your internet internet site now, i truly as if your way of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark website list and will likely be checking back soon. Pls appear at my site likewise and figure out what you believe. 893330

  3. This Site says:

    123124 960712Thanks for this wonderful post! It has long been extremely helpful. I wish that you will carry on posting your wisdom with us. 932405

  4. pgslot says:

    118528 141409Would really like to always get updated excellent website ! . 331538

  5. pgslot says:

    166976 607506Fantastic web site you got here! Yoo man wonderful reads, post some much more! Im gon come back so far better have updated 914783

  6. 198364 85776Hey, you used to write fantastic, but the last few posts have been kinda boringK I miss your fantastic writings. Past couple of posts are just a bit out of track! come on! 832552

  7. 650527 497781Wow, amazing blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your web web site is great, let alone the content! 310677

  8. y2k168 says:

    77455 849612Is going to be again incessantly to inspect new posts 581781

  9. 300590 4941I will tell your friends to pay a visit to this site. .Thanks for the article. 52741

  10. 679788 541372This web page may be a walk-through like the data you wanted concerning this and didnt know who require to. Glimpse here, and youll undoubtedly discover it. 210959

  11. 157468 240037youve gotten an critical weblog correct here! would you wish to make some invite posts on my weblog? 177719

Leave a Reply