Feed on
Posts
Comments

Scary Stats or Not?

In a recent paper, Barro et al find that the probability of a country suffering a “consumption disaster” is about 1.7% per year. That sounds like an awfully scary number to me. For example, that means that over the course of a decade, there is about a 15% chance of having a disaster, and over the course of a typical lifetime (apx 80 years), there is a 75% chance of having a disaster.

I suppose that is large by today’s standards. But our preindustrial ancestors probably faced those kinds of odds each year, not each lifetime. I would love to see an estimate of such a number over time.

6 Responses to “Scary Stats or Not?”

  1. Harry says:

    One point seven percent a year is a big number, particularly if one overspends on anything.

    Compare 1.7% to .035%, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. We are going to be asked to spend .017 times a hundred trillion (or is it ten trillion or a quadrillion?) every year to reduce carbon dioxide by a theoretical .002%, thereby theoretically saving Tonga’s beach cottages. This is change one can believe in.

    OK, I might be off by a zero here and a decimal point there, but it seems to me that few others are using their calculators. Maybe you could give your students a lesson in scientific notation so they can keep up.

  2. Harry says:

    Or is it seventeen times pi times a trillion dollars times ten to the tenth divided by two? Whatever the number, we can well-afford it.

  3. 951237 301113We clean up on completion. This may sound obvious but not several a plumber in Sydney does. We wear uniforms and always treat your home or office with respect. 302363

  4. 428712 211894You completed several good points there. I did a search on the issue and identified almost all people will have the same opinion along with your weblog. 823815

  5. home says:

    143632 782984Hello! I just want to make a enormous thumbs up with the amazing information youve here during this post. We are returning to your weblog for additional soon. 953893

  6. 519753 889985There some fascinating points in time in this post but I dont know if I see these center to heart. There could be some validity but Ill take hold opinion until I explore it further. Exceptional post , thanks and then we want a good deal far more! Put into FeedBurner too 554248

Leave a Reply