Feed on
Posts
Comments

Let’s all remember that only Neanderthal skeptics refuse to accept sound science. Here is the latest in the sham scientific community and practice that is known as “Climate Science.” Here is a better illustration. This whole thing reminds me of how the “E”nvironmental community dealt with the issue of Lung Cancer back in the 1950s and 60s. I’ll let Matt Ridley tell the story:

Here he is writing a paper called Lung Cancers and their Causes in 1955 in CA, a cancer journal for clinicians http://caonline.amcancersoc.org/cgi/content/abstract/5/3/95:

1. The total epidemiological, clinical, pathological, and experimental evidence on hand clearly indicates that not a single but several if not numerous industrial or industry-related atmospheric pollutants are to a great part responsible for the causation of lung cancer.

2.While the available data do not permit any definite statement as to the relative importance of the various recognized respiratorycarcinogens in the production of lung cancers in the generalpopulation, they nevertheless unmistakingly suggest that cigarettesmoking is not a major factor in the causation of lung cancernor had it a predominant role in the remarkable increase ofthese tumors during recent decades.

3. In view of the fact that not only a great deal of the existing circumstantial epidemiological evidence but also practically the entire factual and conclusive evidence available on exogenous respiratory carcinogens are either of occupational origin or point to industry-related factors,it would be most unwise at this time to base future preventive measures of lung-cancer hazards mainly on the cigarette theory and to concentrate the immediate epidemiological and experimentalefforts on this evidently overpropagandized and insufficiently documented concept. When environmentalists want to attack a skeptic these days, they quite frequently accuse him or her of being the kind of person who would have defended the tobacco lobby – in some cases with justification. So it is ironic to find that possibly the most iconic and original text of the entire environmental movement, Silent Spring, was built on the work of a fervent tobacco defender. Hueper is quoted frequently throughout Carson’s book.

In other words, the “E”nvironmentalists were so adamant that chemicals were  going to kill us off that they refused to accept that lung cancers were caused by cigarette smoking.

10 Responses to “Newsflash: Smoking is Not the Major Cause of Lung Cancer!”

  1. […] Newsflash: Smoking is Not the Major Cause of Lung Cancer! […]

  2. 669639 449355Good one, there is actually some excellent facts on this post some of my subscribers might find this valuable, will send them a link, a lot of thanks. 537512

  3. right here says:

    432813 968958I dont feel Ive read anything like this before. So good to discover somebody with some original thoughts on this topic. thank for starting this up. This site is something that is required on the internet, someone with slightly originality. Good job for bringing something new towards the internet! 788708

  4. 996781 577622I like what you guys are up also. Such intelligent function and reporting! Maintain up the superb works guys Ive incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I feel itll improve the value of my internet site . 106977

  5. Lucio Sider says:

    great post.Ne’er knew this, appreciate it for letting me know.

  6. I am just commenting to make you know of the great discovery my friend’s girl went through checking your blog. She discovered so many pieces, including how it is like to possess an amazing coaching mood to have many people with ease comprehend specified multifaceted matters. You truly did more than our own expected results. Thank you for presenting those warm and helpful, trusted, informative as well as cool thoughts on that topic to Mary.

  7. I think other website proprietors should take this website as an model, very clean and excellent user genial style.

  8. Thank you for every other informative site. Where else could I am getting that kind of info written in such a perfect approach? I have a project that I am just now operating on, and I have been on the glance out for such information.

  9. Cannabisöl says:

    I am now not certain the place you’re getting your info, however great topic. I must spend a while studying more or understanding more. Thank you for fantastic info I used to be looking for this information for my mission.

  10. 374127 961349Awesome weblog, Im going to spend much more time researching this topic 352798

Leave a Reply