Feed on

My students in science tell me that our sense of smell is perhaps the strongest inducer to memory than of any of the five senses. I tend to agree. There are some smells that are so ingrained in my head that I cannot help but be taken back to when I first remember being exposed to them. But of all of those smells, perhaps there is nothing more pleasant and evokes more fond memories than the smell of a crackling wood fire on an icy winter evening. It perhaps started when I was a Boy Scout, having to sleep in a bottomless canvas tent on ice in the dead of winter, just dreaming of warm cocoa and oatmeal that our warm scout leaders were preparing for when we “awoke” (no one quite sleeps in those conditions). It’s a smell I enjoyed last night as I trundled home around midnight and one of my neighbors must have been warming by their hearth.

Except … burning wood kills people and causes catastrophic injury.

It is certainly one of the most serious health risks that poor countries face. Indeed smoke from the burning of indoor solid fuels was the sixth leading cause of death and the fifth leading cause of disease within poor countries in the oughts. Here is an illustration of why:


Here is what the above World Health Organization Report says about this:

Indoor smoke from solid fuels More than half the world’s population still cooks with wood, dung, coal or agricultural residues on simple stoves or open fires. Especially under conditions
of limited ventilation, solid-fuel use leads to high exposures to indoor smoke and large associated health risks, particularly for women and children. Indoor smoke from solid-fuel use contains a range of potentially harmful substances, from carcinogens to small particulate matter, all of which cause damage to the lungs. Indoor smoke from solid fuel causes about 21% of lower respiratory infection deaths worldwide, 35% of chronic obstructive pulmonary deaths and about 3% of lung cancer deaths. Of these deaths, about 64% occur in low-income countries, especially in South-East Asia and Africa.

And this is surely not limited to poor countries. A very quick search of PubMed should be enough to convince you of this. You will find that smoke from wood fires is as toxic as the exhaust from vehicle tailpipes. You will find that inhalation of wood smoke produces similar impacts on your lungs as smoking cigarettes. You will find that smoke from wood fires leads to significantly more infection and other illness in children than for children not exposed to wood smoke. You will find wood smoke to be highly carcinogenic. Here is one of the many studies I pulled up to examine this. Couple the over 1 million deaths (and many more sicknesses) that occur in poor countries with the thousands of people who suffer lung disease, ear infection, and cancer from exposure to wood smoke in rich countries like the US, and it turns out that wood is among the most serious killers on earth.

People claim that burning wood is carbon neutral, because the dead trees would decay and release the CO2 anyway. But harvesting of trees surely contributes to climate change due to the impact on land use as a result of the harvest, and the actual harvesting activities themselves.

And we living in rich countries cannot be said to “need” to use wood for any purpose anymore. We have plenty of natural gas (cleaner). We have plenty of ways to generate electricity to distribute to people’s homes. The burning of wood in America is clearly a frivolous indulgence. And it’s a frivolous indulgence that kills and maims Americans by the thousands. My neighbor has been burning fires all winter and my son and I have battled coughs and colds all winter. Surely my neighbor’s smoke did not help this. And believe me, the smoke even gets in our house. It has been estimated that 70% of indoor air pollution comes from outside the home.

So, I’ll start taking “E”nviros seriously when they propose a ban on the burning of wood. And then I’d like to see the wood gestapo follow up with enforcing this. The problem of wood even here in America is far more serious than most risks that the “E”nviros claim to care about. It surely is a more serious threat to our health than fracking. It is surely a more serious threat to our health than whatever possible impacts Climate Change will throw at us. It is a problem that afflicts both rich and poor in America, so there shouldn’t be the same “indifference” that folks claim happens when some tragedy only befalls the poor. And since wood is burned from a large variety of sources, even here on my block, economists would argue that it is too costly for me to negotiate with all of the people who are hurting my lungs and eyes, so that Coasean bargains are ruled out. And remember the burning of wood causes other problems too. When I camp in the ADKs, I see pickup trucks on the Thruway piled up with wood taken from other places and brought to the ADKs and vice verse. This is a lovely way to transmit awful pests like the Emerald Ash borer beetle and other diseases.

So how come in all my time being around the “green” community, scarcely a mention of wood has come up? I have my own thought, but I’d like to hear yours. I do hope you understand that I am not serious about banning wood. Though maybe I should be in favor of wood burning standards at least for fireplaces and stoves in homes in densely populated communities. This is something that the local zoning and inspection czars have not gotten their paws on yet, strangely.

4 Responses to “Nothing Like the Smell of a Crackling Fire on an Icy Winter Evening”

  1. Harry says:

    Unless you have an efficient fireplace or stove, I agree that a daily fire, just for the hell of it, is a waste in many ways, and certainly wastes more heat than it produces. Wintercow makes a good point about fires.

    However, concern over whether burning wood versus letting it rot in the forest being CO2 neutral or not is nonsense. If the time consumed working on that problem is significant, it is wasted and better directed toward more useful pursuits, like picking up litter and washing one’s hands.

    How come the enviro students are not fired up about the government ethanol mandates, raising the price of road trips and grain alcohol for the Rites of Spring punch?

  2. Speedmaster says:

    And what of Burning Man?

  3. JB says:

    The sense of smell or “chemical” sense is likely the first sense developed by living organisms. There are actually about 400 functional odor receptors in the nose and each odorant has a different receptor profile. We can detect ~400,000 distinct odors!

    The useless tidbits we learn in medical school…

  4. Jeff says:

    I grew up in the country so smelling neighbor’s wood stoves and fireplaces in the winter wasn’t an issue (having many acres of forests surrounding your home disperses it). My first home purchase was in town and the development has homes on 60×100 lots. Tightly clustered together and many burn wood in Northern California where its plentiful. It smells of smoke most days from November through February. I hate it. I mean hate it to the point I’m counting the days until I can sell it and move out in the country again. I can’t believe how short-sighted people are about their health to save a bit on their utility bill (the winters aren’t severe here so even gas for central heat won’t cost that much). Not to mention what they do to everyone around them.

Leave a Reply