A particularly thorny philosophical problem for limited government classical liberal types is that while they want to see voluntary exchanges and private property governing as many human interactions as is “reasonable”, they typically leave it to the state to defend property rights and handle contracting disputes and third party spillovers. You can see the problem here – voluntary exchange is great and all, but for the most very important part of a philosophy of protecting private property, the theory seems to “require” not only strong government, but also impartial and reliable government. I have not yet seen a great response to this problem from the small government types – in this case I think the more philosophically consistent positions are held by those with more extreme views – either toward full socialism or full anarchy.
With that in mind, I think some critics of property rights protections and small government find themselves in a similar bind when making specific claims against markets. For example, I was reading an old article today that had at its core the very Smithian idea that corporations will find it in their interests to conspire against the public. I don’t disagree. The argument obviously continues in the usual way, with proposals for how government actions can make it harder for firms to do this. Think about simple cases of price fixing by firms (by the way I wonder if elite Universities ever worry about a collusion case being brought against them?) … the idea is that firms must get together and provide incentives for both colluders and non-colluders to behave. Among the obvious challenges to doing this is parties to the collusion must find a way to enforce their agreements.
But here’s the rub. Since these parties are breaking the “law” they cannot turn to the government to protect and enforce these “contracts.” You obviously see the philosophical tension here with the argument we started with. If markets and exchange can’t be said to be free, or cannot actually be free, because they require strong government protections of property rights, then one would probably have to believe that collusive behavior by firms to operate against the interests of consumers is not possible. On the other hand, if one wishes to argue that corporations are going to be successful in enforcing contracts among themselves to enforce shady behavior, while likely to be the case, this sort of undermines the philosophical necessity to argue that government is an important piece of markets and that they cannot operate in its absence.
My own view is, of course, that these arguments are fun to have and serve to discipline our thinking, but that thinking about markets absent broader institutional and cultural considerations is like, well, it’s not the right thing to do.
f1wc7zx
j1i09t
fm98hp
h5a4pc
tdq1tt
qbk2o1
iq3h8x
sxu89m
Very great information can be found on website. “I can think of nothing less pleasurable than a life devoted to pleasure.” by John D. Rockefeller.
Thiis is myy first timje goo to ssee att here and i am in fact happy too ead all att alone place.
Generally I don’t learn post on blogs, butt I wish too ssay that this write-up
very compoelled mme too tryy and doo so! Yourr writing
styyle haas beeen surdprised me. Tank you, vvery grdeat article.
You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be actually something which I think I’d never understand. It seems too complex and extremely large for me. I’m taking a look forward for your subsequent submit, I?¦ll attempt to get the cling of it!
It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d most certainly donate to this excellent blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to brand new updates and will share this site with my Facebook group. Talk soon!
I have been absent for some time, but now I remember why I used to love this website. Thanks, I will try and check back more frequently. How frequently you update your web site?
Thanx for the effort, keep up the good work Great work, I am going to start a small Blog Engine course work using your site I hope you enjoy blogging with the popular BlogEngine.net.Thethoughts you express are really awesome. Hope you will right some more posts.
Hello! I could have sworn I’ve been to this site before but after reading through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Anyhow, I’m definitely glad I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back often!
Thanks for one’s marvelous posting! I seriously enjoyed reading it, you could be a great author.I will ensure that I bookmark your blog and definitely will come back later in life. I want to encourage you to ultimately continue your great posts, have a nice evening!
In the great design of things you get a B+ just for effort. Exactly where you lost me personally ended up being in all the specifics. You know, people say, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be more true right here. Having said that, allow me say to you what exactly did deliver the results. Your writing can be highly persuasive and this is most likely the reason why I am making the effort in order to opine. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, while I can see a leaps in logic you come up with, I am definitely not confident of just how you seem to connect your details which in turn make your conclusion. For the moment I shall yield to your position but trust in the near future you connect the facts better.