It is about more government. Just like environmental protection is not about the environment and just like financial market reform is not about financial safety. Ralph Nader’s Center for Auto Safety had a chance to choose whether they cared more about auto safety or more government control of the car market, and what side do you think they chose?
In the late 1980s, David Henderson tells in his excellent book, The Joy of Freedom, Sam Kazman brought suit against the federal government because economic evidence showed that the CAFE laws led to many more deaths over the life of the cars sold under the CAFE standard than would have happened absent it. Why did the deaths occur? Because part of the way you make a car get better mileage is to make it lighter and smaller.
Which side did Nader and his Center choose to support? Car safety of course. No, you would be wrong. He chose more government regulation instead.
In a similar vain, those who kneel at the altar of subsidized mass transportation are trying to destroy electric cars:
222986 708356I feel this really is among the most vital info for me. And im glad reading your article. But wanna remark on few general items, The internet site style is perfect, the articles is genuinely fantastic : D. Great job, cheers 361076
24563 227630Hey! Im at function surfing about your weblog from my new apple iphone! Just wanted to say I adore reading through your blog and look forward to all your posts! Maintain up the outstanding function! 788700
343191 461829I was reading some of your content material on this internet site and I conceive this internet site is truly informative ! Keep on putting up. 429091
Muchas gracias. ?Como puedo iniciar sesion?
375966 375266Maintain up the wonderful piece of work, I read couple of weblog posts on this internet site and I believe that your internet site is real intriguing and has lots of fantastic data. 44713
98194 345223Spot up for this write-up, I in fact feel this outstanding internet site requirements a lot a lot more consideration. Ill much more likely be once once again to read considerably far more, thank you that details. 176814