When someone is “wronged” it does not follow that the remedy is to modify the actions and behaviors of the person “committing” the “wrong.” For example, if my parents are offended that I have walked away from the actual practice of Catholicism, despite my wishes for it to be otherwise, perhaps it is not my behavior that needs to be altered – especially if I tolerate the very behaviors that cause me alarm on their part. This obviously applies to the economic sphere as well.
Weekend Contemplation
Apr 10th, 2011 by wintercow20
Wintercow often leaves us with much to chew on as we go to bed.
As far as political economy goes, the world would be a better place if those who think they have been wronged would think about what is right.
Happy thoughts to Wintercow, his herd, and the red clover they chew.
I think this is along the lines of the Coase theorem. A lawyer put it thus: it takes two to tort.
This blog won’t render properly on my apple iphone – you may want to try and fix that
I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your website. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme? Fantastic work!
Hello there! Would you mind if I share your blog with my zynga group? There’s a lot of folks that I think would really appreciate your content. Please let me know. Thanks
Hey there! I’m at work browsing your blog from my new iphone! Just wanted to say I love reading through your blog and look forward to all your posts! Carry on the great work!
334559 764316I ought to appear into this and it would be a difficult job to go over this completely here. 60409