If I had any interest in running for office and had to convince a group of voters that I had some smart policies that everyone could support, here is one I might begin with. Remember my rules for policy proposals – they cannot be partisan in the sense that the solution is a natural favorite of either party, and they cannot be outright measures to either shrink or expand the size of government. In some sense, consider these marginal improvements in policy that actually would have a chance of passing even in this climate.
By now it is very evident that US farm subsidies are an awful idea, with subsidies for the growth of feedstocks for ethanol and other biofuels the champion of global food disruptions, environmental degradation and wasting of massive amounts of resources. People and politicians in both parties know this. Environmentalists know this. Even the farmers themselves know this. Yet we all seem to think that we have to be stuck in this unappealing equilibrium.
To give you a sense of the magnitude of the direct subsidies – over the past 15 years, total farm subsidies have amounted to over $250 billion and these ignore the value of import quotas and tariffs such as the tariff on imported sugar based ethanol from cheaper and more efficient Southern country competitors. We also know that these subsidies are not often lavished on the poor, small farmers that we have in our heads when we think of “supporting farmers.” Indeed, 10% of farmers collect 74% of all subsidies (so much for government addressing inequalities!). I don’t need to get into the economic and environmental problems with these subsidies, take them as given for now, or perhaps I will put up a series of slides from class in the future.
Today, we send about $20 billion per year in direct subsidies to farmers. Many people like myself simply advocate ending the subsidies cold-turkey. And I do, at least when I am not in polite company. In polite company, that is not a “reasonable” change. But this is: end every farm subsidy and replace it with a dollar-for-dollar subsidy for wind turbine production and installation. Now many of you will say I am crazy, especially since you understand full well the problems with “green jobs” programs and government central management. But I ask simply that you think like an economist for a moment and ask yourself: “as compared to what?” Sure subsidizing wind is an awful idea when we compare it to a well-functioning market economy with respect for the rule of law and property rights and with minimal externality problems. But that is not the world we live in. If we replace crop subsidies with turbine subsidies, I would view this as a no regrets policy – much like I would view a policy of taxing carbon and other “undesirable” goods as favorable so long as they replaced capital gains, personal income and corporate income taxation.
On the environmental side the benefits of doing this are obvious – even if windpower is not a reasonable solution to our energy problems (it may be, but that post is for another day). With farmers planting wind mills instead of corn, we would possibly reduce the acreage under tillage, which reduces soil erosion and nutrient runoff into the watersheds. And by farming windmills instead of corn, we are very likely to reduce the amount of water used on farms as well as reduce the amount of CO2 generated from the subsidized activities. With windmills on the farms, it is still possible for farmers to dedicate their land to the growing of important foodstuffs, driven by actual supply and demand factors and not political factors. This would also eliminate pressure to grow foodstuffs on land unsuitable for it. And with the extra income farmers would have from these subsidies, it might be the case that we would see an increase in land returning to its “natural” state and a better provision of habitat for all kinds of plant and animal species.
On the economic side, the distortions from the subsidies to wind should not be any different from the distortions from subsidizing particular farm activities. Food prices would likely fall (for meat too, since corn is a valuable input into meat production) around the world, but prices of farmland would not fall, since the rents to owning farmland would not be dissipated by this policy change. Furthermore, even if these subsidies are overspending for the implementation of wind, say by spending $500 to clean up a unit of CO2 as compared to the $25 of damage that CO2 causes today, that is still an improvement over what ethanol was doing. So, we are likely to get an environmental improvement as compared to the existing farm policies with the theoretical possibility that turbine production and generation could ultimately be a cost-effective way of supplying lots of energy in an environmentally friendlier way than we do today (again, I am not reporting all of the possible problems with wind, per se, that is not the point of this post).
In many respects, replacing corn subsidies with windmill subsidies (somehow directed to farmers) is a “no regrets” policy. At its worst, even if it is a total failure, it is exactly as destructive as current farm policy. But this program has the potential, a very good one I would argue, to benefit both the economy and the environment, so long as the program of farm subsidies is ended concurrently. That means we don’t implement the second part of this policy (more subsidies for wind) with a promise to reduce farm subsidies over the next decade or two. It means they end cold turkey – perhaps with a one-year or two-year phase in of the program.
Politically and practically the “benefit” of this proposal is that it should keep the ingrained constituencies happy. On the demand side, the farmers are probably just as happy to “plant” steel wind turbines as they are corn – indeed, it requires far less work on their part. On the supply side, the bureaucracies should support it too – so long as the subsidy program goes to farmers the USDA and the DOE (both departments that should be boarded up in reality) would continue to exist and indeed would likely see their influence expanded. We still need to collect taxes for the subsidies, so the IRS does not lose any influence or jobs either. And of course these programs would not seem to alter the distribution of favors and influence in Washington – which as sickening as it is, seems to me to be the only way to get true support for any programs.
Such a policy seems to strike the trifecta of “good” policy: it improves economic outcomes, it improves environmental outcomes and it does not alter the political outlook in any meaningful way. Without resorting to the devils in the details of such a program, can we think of why this policy would also be doomed to failure or why I would never win the Congressional seat in my district by offering up such a bargain?
Here was the last edition in the series.
UPDATE: Yes, writing a post like this emanates from a certain amount of depression and self-loathing that have been increasing on this side of the farm. It almost makes me ill to “have to” write it.
I favor the establishment of a special tax credit for planting a windmill and the allowance of accelerated depreciation with the double-declining balance method of cost recovery. This alone should create or save at least 100,000 CPA jobs annually.
You forgot to say what you’d do with the surplus dairy products and the farmer-held grain reserve. Blow them up with nuclear weapons? That way you’d get unilateral disarmament AND happy farmers at the same time.
The first part, about abolishing the USDA, is a great idea.
The part about subsidizing wind farms, and injecting Co2 into the argument, is far-fetched.
How about abolishing the EPA, DOE, and the Department of Labor, for three trillion or more in outlays and friction?
Keep the Department of State, and keep the Department of Defensce, but rename it The Departmet of War.
I have no idea what to do with all of those empty office buildings in Washington. A whole top floor for my daughter, fee simple, and the bottom floors rented as pied-a-terres for anyone who has contributed to the Unbroken Window, Speedmaster getting first ribs?
So as I see it there is a net marginal gain here, eliminating an extremely poor subsidy but replacing it with one that is arguably less damaging. And it could work politically, so why not embrace it?
I see the logic, but it also is a surrender. Essentially it seems fatalistic to me. We seem to be shrugging our shoulders and saying “hey, ubsidies are never going to go away, so we may as well get some really smart central planners to find those that are least destructive but appease the incumbent rent seekers.”
I think on balance it is better to fight the good fight, continue to teach and maintain excellent blogs like this to point out the inherently destructive natureof subsidies. A good post, nonetheless, it made me think…
737740 609516Oh my goodness! a amazing post dude. A lot of thanks Even so We are experiencing difficulty with ur rss . Dont know why Can not sign up to it. Could there be anybody locating identical rss difficulty? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Thnkx 989672
Australians have discovered an unlikely pop-up store offering shoppers ‘incredible’ deals on clothing,
homewares, food, and electronics.
The temporary Vinnies locations have been set up around Victoria to help shoppers get through the cost of
living crisis ravaging the country.
Vinnies, or the St Vincent de Paul Society, is a charity that works to provide support and
assistance to people in need.
Most items are brand new stock donated by corporate partners including Christmas decorations.
Popular bargains include $10 large jars of Biscoff, $2
bags of Red Rock Deli chips, and discounted shoes from Boston Bros.
Shoppers will find men’s, women’s, and children’s clothing, shoes from top brands, and even electrical goods at
the Vinnies pop-up locations.
Many have purchased vacuums, air fryers, Adidas shoes, printers, and kitchen knives from previous pop-up shops.
There is presently a location in Ascot Vale which is open until 3 November, and
another in Boronia which will remain open until Christmas – or until stock runs out.
Australians have discovered an unlikely pop-up
store offering shoppers ‘incredible’ deals on clothing, homewares, food, and electronics
Popular bargains include $10 large jars of Biscoff, $2 bags of Red Rock Deli chips, and discounted shoes from Boston Bros
A new store will open in Richmond at Dimmey’s on 7
November.
The themed Richmond location will focus on goods
for Christmas, summer, and the holiday season – but
it will also include household items, Bric-à-brac, and electrical
items.
Shoppers have shared their thoughts on the pop-up locations online.
‘They have all the trending products – it’s so awesome,’ one said.
‘I bought a hair dryer from Vinnies and I’m obsessed with it,’ another
wrote.
‘I always have such good luck at Vinnies, I have to go,’ a woman added.
For those interested in the finer things, shoppers have discovered a
‘hidden gem’ discount retailer where you can find designer buys from brands like Fendi, Dior, and Aje for affordable prices.
TK Maxx – which has stores in New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland and South Australia – is the
answer to buying new clothes and shoes on a budget.
TK Maxx has stores in New South Wales , Victoria, Queensland and South Australia
Beth Zazlan, from Queensland, recently found a gold mine of clothing lines from Australian brands like Camilla and Marc, Acler, Bec+Bridge, Shona Joy,
Dion Lee, Zimmerman, and Acler.
‘I was there for a pillow but I ended up grabbing some sparkly earrings from
[American jewellery brand] Badgley Mischka,’ Beth told FEMAIL.
TK Maxx sells old stock from previous seasons – and shoppers have described it as a
‘clearance treasure hunt’.
Many have seen bags from Fendi, Dior, and Bottega Venetta on sale.
Others have spotted Gucci and Versace sunglasses, Hugo Boss
accessories, and Christopher Esber dresses.
Beth said, ‘I was truly blown away – so if you’re looking for a bargain, head
there.’
A David Jones employee revealed in a comment that discounted items from stores that aren’t sold are shipped to TK Maxx.
ขายไวน์ ได้รับความสนใจจากผู้ที่ชื่นชอบไวน์ ไม่ว่าจะเป็นไวน์แดง
หรือใช้เป็นของขวัญในโอกาสพิเศษ
ถ้ากำลังมองหาร้านไวน์ที่น่าเชื่อถือ ควรเลือกซื้อจากร้านที่มีความน่าเชื่อถือ เพื่อการจับคู่กับอาหารที่เหมาะสม
มีใครแนะนำร้านไวน์ laughing bird 1.5 ลิตร ราคาดีๆ ได้บ้าง ช่วยแนะนำกันหน่อยนะคะ เพราะการเลือกไวน์ที่เหมาะสมช่วยเพิ่มความสุขในทุกโอกาส
Do Greens and crossbenchers who claim that transparency and integrity is at the heart
of their reason for entering Parliament in the first place hear themselves?
In the past few days they have mounted self-serving
arguments against proposed electoral reforms that the major parties look set to come together to support.
The reforms include caps for how much money wealthy individuals can donate, caps on the amount candidates
can spend in individual electorates to prevent the equivalent of an arms race,
and a $90million limit on what any party can spend at
an election – actually less than the major parties
currently spend.
The proposed new laws also include lower disclosure thresholds for
donations, thus increasing the transparency of who makes
political donations in the first place.
So the wealthy wont be able to hide behind anonymity while using their cash to influence election outcomes
– and the extent to which they can use their wealth at all will be limited.
The bill will further improve transparency by
also increasing the speed and frequency that disclosures of donations need to be made.
At present we have the absurd situation in which donations get made – but you only find out the details of who has given what to
whom many months later, well after elections are won and lost.
In other words, what is broadly being proposed will result in much greater transparency
and far less big money being injected into
campaigning by the wealthy.
Teal Kylea Tink claimed the major parties were ‘running scared’ with the
policy and warned the reform would ‘not stop the rot’
Greens senate leader Larissa Waters (left) fired a warning shot – saying if it serves only
the major parties ‘it’s a rort, not reform’. Teal independent ACT senator David Pocock (right) said: ‘What seems to be happening is a major-party
stitch-up’
Anyone donating more than $1,000 to a political party, as opposed to $16,000 under the current rules, will
need to disclose having done so. And how much they can donate will be capped.
Yet the Greens and Teals have quickly condemned the proposed new laws, labeling them a ‘stitch-up’, ‘outrageous’
and ‘a rort, not a reform’.
They have lost their collective minds after finding out that Labor’s proposal just might secure the
support of the opposition.
I had to double check who was criticising what exactly
before even starting to write this column.
Because I had assumed – incorrectly – that these important
transparency measures stamping out the influence of the
wealthy must have been proposed by the virtue-signalling Greens or the corruption-fighting Teals, in a united crossbench effort to drag
the major parties closer to accountability.
More fool me.
The bill, designed to clean up a rotten system, is being put forward by Labor and is opposed by a growing cabal of crossbenchers.
It makes you wonder what they have to hide. Put simply, the Greens and Teals doth
protest too much on this issue.
Labor is thought to be trying to muscle out major political donors such as Clive
Palmer
Another potential target of the laws is businessman and Teal funder
Simon Holmes à Court
The Greens have taken massive donations in the past, contrary to their irregular calls to
tighten donations rules (Greens leader Adam Bandt and Senator Mehreen Faruqi are pictured)
The major parties have long complained about the influence the likes of Simon Holmes
à Court wields behind the scenes amongst the
Teals.
And we know the Greens have taken massive donations from the wealthy in the past, contrary to their irregular calls to tighten donations rules.
Now that tangible change has been proposed, these bastions of virtue are running a mile from reforms that will curtail dark art of political
donations.
The Labor government isn’t even seeking for these transparency rules to take effect
immediately, by the way. It won’t be some sort of quick-paced
power play before the next election designed to catch the crossbench out.
They are aiming for implementation by 2026, giving everyone enough time
to absorb and understand the changes before preparing for
them.
Don’t get me wrong, no deal has yet been done between Labor and the Coalition. I imagine the opposition want to go over
the laws with a fine tooth comb.
As they should – because it certainly isn’t beyond Labor to include hidden one-party advantages in the proposed design which
would create loopholes only the unions are capable of taking
advantage of, therefore disadvantaging the Coalition electorally in the years to come.
But short of such baked-in trickiness scuttling a deal to
get these proposed laws implemented, the crossbench
should offer their support, not cynical opposition, to what is being advocated for.
They might even be able to offer something worthwhile that
could be incorporated in the package.
To not do so exposes their utter hypocrisy and blowhard
false commentary about being in politics to ‘clean things up’.
IQOS terea ราคา เหมาะสำหรับผู้ที่มองหาทางเลือกใหม่ ด้วยเทคโนโลยีใหม่ที่สะอาดและปลอดภัยยิ่งขึ้น
หากคุณกำลังมองหาข้อมูลเกี่ยวกับ IQOS TEREA แนะนำให้ศึกษาข้อมูลรีวิวก่อนตัดสินใจ เพราะแต่ละร้านอาจมีโปรโมชั่นที่แตกต่างกัน
ใครเคยลอง IQOS TEREA บ้าง ลองมาแลกเปลี่ยนความคิดเห็นกันค่ะ จะได้ช่วยให้ตัดสินใจได้ง่ายขึ้น
IQOS terea บุหรี่ ราคา เหมาะสำหรับผู้ที่มองหาทางเลือกใหม่ ด้วยเทคโนโลยีใหม่ที่สะอาดและปลอดภัยยิ่งขึ้น
ถ้าสนใจลองใช้ IQOS
TEREA ลองเปรียบเทียบราคาจากหลายแหล่งเพื่อความคุ้มค่า เพราะแต่ละร้านอาจมีโปรโมชั่นที่แตกต่างกัน
ใครเคยลอง IQOS TEREA บ้าง ช่วยแชร์ประสบการณ์กันนะคะ จะได้ช่วยให้ตัดสินใจได้ง่ายขึ้น
ใครชื่นชอบไวน์เหมือนกันบ้าง มาแบ่งปันข้อมูลเกี่ยวกับไวน์กัน กำลังมองหาไวน์นำเข้าคุณภาพดีอยู่
ถ้าคุณรู้จักร้านไวน์ดีๆ บอกต่อกันนะ ไวน์ดีๆ จะช่วยเพิ่มบรรยากาศให้ทุกมื้ออาหาร รอคำตอบจากทุกคนอยู่นะ
รู้สึกว่าเว็บนี้ตอบโจทย์คนรักไวน์มากจริงๆ
ติดตามเว็บนี้แล้วรู้สึกว่ามีความรู้เรื่องไวน์เพิ่มขึ้น เว็บไซต์นี้เหมาะกับคนที่อยากเรียนรู้เรื่องไวน์มาก
หวังว่าทุกคนจะมีความสุขกับการดื่มไวน์ จะติดตามเว็บนี้ต่อไปเรื่อยๆ ค่ะ
ขอบคุณมากค่ะ!
Here is my homepage เซลล์ขายไวน์ pantip
ขอบคุณที่แบ่งปันความรู้เกี่ยวกับไวน์ ฉันกำลังมองหาร้านขายไวน์ที่น่าสนใจ ถ้ามีไวน์ตัวใหม่แนะนำ!
Also visit my blog post :: splendour wine ราคา
การออกแบบโลโก้ เป็นส่วนสำคัญในการสร้างภาพลักษณ์ของธุรกิจ เพราะมันทำให้ธุรกิจดูมีความน่าเชื่อถือ
การออกแบบโลโก้ที่ดี
ต้องมีความหมายลึกซึ้ง
เพื่อให้ลูกค้าจดจำได้ทันที
การเลือกฟอนต์ เป็นสิ่งที่ต้องให้ความสำคัญ
และทำให้โลโก้ดูเข้ากับแบรนด์
หากคุณกำลังคิดที่จะปรับปรุงโลโก้ ควรเลือกผู้ที่มีประสบการณ์ในการออกแบบโลโก้!
ดอกไม้งานศพ เป็นการส่งต่อความคิดถึง สามารถทำให้งานดูสงบและเคารพ
การเลือกดอกไม้งานศพ ควรคำนึงถึงความหมายของดอกไม้ เพราะดอกไม้ทุกชนิดมีความหมายเฉพาะ เช่น ดอกลิลลี่
ที่สามารถแสดงถึงความสงบ
การจัดดอกไม้ในงานศพ สามารถปรับรูปแบบการจัดดอกไม้ให้เหมาะสม ไม่ว่าจะเป็นการจัดช่อดอกไม้ สามารถช่วยทำให้บรรยากาศในงานศพดูนุ่มนวลและสมเกียรติ
หากคุณต้องการจัดดอกไม้งานศพ ควรเลือกผู้ที่มีความเชี่ยวชาญในการจัดดอกไม้งานศพ
เพื่อให้ได้ดอกไม้ที่สวยงามและมีความหมาย
บทความนี้ทำให้เข้าใจเรื่องไวน์ได้ดีขึ้น กำลังสนใจซื้อไวน์มาใช้ในโอกาสพิเศษ อยากเห็นบทความเกี่ยวกับไวน์ ออนไลน์อีก!
การจัดช่อดอกไม้
สามารถทำให้วันสำคัญของคุณสมบูรณ์แบบยิ่งขึ้น ไม่ว่าจะเป็น ช่อดอกไม้ที่ออกแบบมาเฉพาะ สามารถสร้างความประทับใจให้กับผู้รับ หากคุณกำลังมองหาช่อดอกไม้ที่เหมาะสมกับงานของคุณ ไม่ควรพลาดในการเลือกช่อดอกไม้จากร้านที่เชื่อถือได้!
ไอคอส รุ่นล่าสุด เป็น ตัวเลือก
ที่ยอดเยี่ยม สำหรับ คนที่ต้องการเลิกบุหรี่ เพราะ ช่วยลดกลิ่นเผาไหม้ ส่วนตัวเคยลอง ไอคอส รุ่นล่าสุด แล้วรู้สึก ประทับใจ ใครที่กำลังสนใจ
ไอคอส แนะนำให้ลองศึกษาข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมดูนะครับ/ค่ะ รับรองว่า ไม่ผิดหวัง!
Wow, awesome blog layout! How long have yyou been blogging
for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your web site
is fantastic, let alone the content!
Revieew my web blog – ขาย ไวน์
253968 133071I surely didnt recognize that. Learnt a thing new today! Thanks for that. 468582
การเลือกช่อดอกไม้
สามารถทำให้วันสำคัญของคุณสมบูรณ์แบบยิ่งขึ้น
ไม่ว่าจะเป็น ช่อดอกไม้สวยๆ สามารถทำให้บรรยากาศของงานน่าประทับใจมากยิ่งขึ้น หากคุณกำลังมองหาช่อดอกไม้ที่เหมาะสมกับงานของคุณ ไม่ควรพลาดในการเลือกช่อดอกไม้จากร้านที่เชื่อถือได้!