Feed on

This says NOTHING at all about the planet not warming and nothing at all about CO2 not being a greenhouse gas and nothing at all about man not causing it … But this sort of thing is what gets condemned by the climate high priests as “anti science heresy” … Of course it is nothing of the source.

Regardless of whether you believe it, it illustrates just where the true consensus ends and the serious questions remain.

“World Health Organization and British government-sponsored global impact studies indicate that, relative to other factors, global warming’s impact on key determinants of human and environmental well-being should be small through 2085 even under the warmest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scenario. Specifically, over 20 other health risks currently contribute more to death and disease worldwide than global warming.”
“warming should reduce future global population at risk of water stress, and pressures on ecosystems and biodiversity (by increasing net biome productivity and decreasing habitat conversion).”

“For both developing and industrialized countries, net GDP per capita—albeit an imperfect surrogate for human well-being—should be (1) double the current US level by 2100 under the warmest scenario, and (2) lowest under the poorest IPCC scenario but highest under the warmest scenario through 2200. The warmest world, being wealthier, should also have greater capacity to address any problem, including warming. Therefore, other problems and, specifically, lowered economic development are greater threats to humanity than global warming.”

The paper is here. Of course the Koch Brothers paid him so feel free to disregard.

One Response to “An Illustration of the NON-Climate Consensus”

  1. Harry says:

    Well, I appreciate Energizer WC’s efforts in providing a free daily economic lesson to us.

    The crickets must be assured that everything is settled.

Leave a Reply