Feed on
Posts
Comments

Via Tyler Cowen, here is one of the many, many, many emerging stories about the implementation of the PPACA:

Labor unions enthusiastically backed the Obama administration’s health-care overhaul when it was up for debate. Now that the law is rolling out, some are turning sour.

Union leaders say many of the law’s requirements will drive up the costs for their health-care plans and make unionized workers less competitive. Among other things, the law eliminates the caps on medical benefits and prescription drugs used as cost-containment measures in many health-care plans. It also allows children to stay on their parents’ plans until they turn 26.

To offset that, the nation’s largest labor groups want their lower-paid members to be able to get federal insurance subsidies while remaining on their plans. In the law, these subsidies were designed only for low-income workers without employer coverage as a way to help them buy private insurance.

…Contacted for this article, Obama administration officials said the issue is subject to regulations still being written…

Top officers at the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, the AFL-CIO and other large labor groups plan to keep pressing the Obama administration to expand the federal subsidies to these jointly run plans, warning that unionized employers may otherwise drop coverage. A handful of unions say they already have examined whether it makes sense to shift workers off their current plans and onto private coverage subsidized by the government. But dropping insurance altogether would undermine a central point of joining a union, labor leaders say.

…The Teamsters’ Mr. Hall said his union has no plans to eliminate workers’ insurance. Instead, he worries employers will have an incentive to drop coverage in collective bargaining if they can’t tap the subsidies.

All of a sudden, people are figuring this out.  The article is here, and for the pointer I thank Craig Garthwaite.

Well, at least you can enjoy the music. Have a great weekend everybody.

Stones

5 Responses to ““Whatcha favorite flavor?”, “Cherry red””

  1. Andrew says:

    The weirdest part, for me, is how you can pass the laws and then write all the regulations that constitute the law.

  2. Harry says:

    This is big news to AFSCME and the SEIU. They are all screwed. But it is worse news to people working in the so-called private sector.

    I had a client, my company had a client, for over forty years, a labor union health and welfare fund that for a long time we helped manage, so well that for twenty years it was self-funded. Looking back , we should have urged them to make a few million more in contributions to the fund in case a rainy day came.

    We turned eighty thousand into over three million over those years, and, without further contributions, they ate into all of it as Blue Cross bills rose.

    Eventually everything was liquidated to pay their rising Blue Cross bill. At one meeting one guy complained that we owned a hundred Walmart bonds, and after my brief attempt to explain the difference between being a creditor and a stockholder, said, OK, we will sell ’em.

    Now, thanks to Obama, they are screwed. They never counted on the public unions screwing the bricklayers.

    Unless we figure out growth, we are all screwed, but then, nobody will be making a carbon footprint.

  3. 189947 895900Some truly nice and utilitarian info on this internet website , likewise I think the design and style holds great capabilities. 143560

  4. cams says:

    693380 923089Yeah bookmaking this wasnt a speculative decision outstanding post! . 477090

  5. live cams says:

    859514 360300Hi there! I just wish to give an enormous thumbs up for the good info youve correct here on this post. I shall be coming again to your weblog for extra soon. 434260

Leave a Reply