Feed on
Posts
Comments

Category Archive for 'Classical Liberalism'

Going Full Monty

In all intellectual spheres comes a time when people debate how rigorously one must adhere to the “party line” in order to be considered a true “party member.” On the libertarian side of things, Murray Rothbard was perhaps the most stringent and forceful proponent of pushing ideological purity. Rothbard understood that the world was miles [...]

Read Full Post »

A Punch in the Gulch

Here is Jeff Sachs on libertarians: Yet the error of libertarianism lies not in championing liberty, but in championing liberty to the exclusion of all other values. Libertarians hold that individual liberty should never be sacrificed in the pursuit of other values or causes. Compassion, justice, civic responsibility, honesty, decency, humility, respect, and even survival [...]

Read Full Post »

We might as well make this an ongoing series as well. Let’s stop and think about why some of the Occupy Wall Streeters are upset. They are upset that working hard and getting an education has not produced a “fair” return for them, and that some folks in society are getting an “unfair” return. Fine, [...]

Read Full Post »

Diligent readers will know that I frequently bang on the idea that we ought to be humble regarding the state of our knowledge and our ability to act on it. But that does not mean, as Hayek correctly pointed out, that economists cannot say anything, about the world. We are well positioned to make what [...]

Read Full Post »

The Thanksgiving Gift

Today I reprint a piece I put together several years ago. Happy Thanksgiving to all. Four centuries after the celebration of the first Thanksgiving, there is still widespread disagreement about the reason for the Pilgrims’ feast. But whether it was a harvest festival, a strictly religious observance, or a thank you to the local Wampanoag [...]

Read Full Post »

The concept of human rights is a particularly appealing one for folks on the left. Invoking human rights in an argument is sort of like insinuating that your opponents don’t think human beings matter. It’s a neat rhetorical trick, and it’s tiring. If a progressive, for example argues for nationalized health care, and I push [...]

Read Full Post »

I find it strange that social justice issues are tied into environmental issues. We’ll post a few times on the meaning of social justice in the coming months. Let’s assume that we know what the heck that means. Let’s inaugurate the series with a simple observation about just who many “green” programs are benefiting and [...]

Read Full Post »

Two OWS Links

1. The ever insightful Meghan McArdle. 2. A somewhat whiny observation albeit one that I have to lean in favor of.

Read Full Post »

In a recent survey of the OWS crowd: Our research shows clearly that the movement doesn’t represent unemployed America and is not ideologically diverse. Rather, it comprises an unrepresentative segment of the electorate that believes in radical redistribution of wealth, civil disobedience and, in some instances, violence. Half (52%) have participated in a political movement [...]

Read Full Post »

The argument from intimidation is healthily employed in polite company. When people learn that I oppose FDA regulation of drugs, it is asserted that I want to see people get sick and die. When people learn that I oppose much of what the EPA does, they assume that I want the rivers to boil over [...]

Read Full Post »

Next »